EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN IMPLIED-IN-LAW (QUASI-CONTRACT) AND AN IMPLIED-IN-FACT CONTRACT.

Description

Write an 800- to 1,200-word paper using Microsoft® Word. Address the following questions: • What type of intellectual property was at issue in this case? Were these ideas entitled to protection under the law? • Explain the difference between an implied-in-law (quasi-contract) and an implied-in-fact contract. What type of contract was at issue in this case? • Explain what the parties could have done differently to protect their rights and avoid this dispute. • Explain how a properly written contract could have been utilized for the licensing and use of the intellectual property to prevent the issue, and provide terms you would recommend be included in such a contract. • Identify and explain each of the elements that would have been necessary to form a valid contract

Get this Assignment Done for You NOW, Place an Order with Us (30% Discount)

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
  • 24/7 Customer Support

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GET YOUR PROJECT DONE ASAP